« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]

Author Topic: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.  (Read 91243 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline CV67PAT

  • MOC Charter Member
  • Posts: 2615
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #120 on: June 25, 2012, 04:19:39 PM »
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 03:52:00 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 01:42:11 PM
Wow, so much anti-open carry attitude on an open carry website... :'(

More like "anti-stupid" attitude.

No, it is anti-open carry attitudes on an open carry forum.

No. It's not.
Logged
Want to keep informed of events in your area? Go to http://www.miopencarry.org/update

Offline kwikrnu

  • AmmoDump
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #121 on: June 25, 2012, 04:25:26 PM »
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 04:19:39 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 03:52:00 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 01:42:11 PM
Wow, so much anti-open carry attitude on an open carry website... :'(

More like "anti-stupid" attitude.

No, it is anti-open carry attitudes on an open carry forum.

No. It's not.

Yes, it is.
Logged

Offline CV67PAT

  • MOC Charter Member
  • Posts: 2615
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #122 on: June 25, 2012, 04:33:04 PM »
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:25:26 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 04:19:39 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 03:52:00 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 01:42:11 PM
Wow, so much anti-open carry attitude on an open carry website... :'(

More like "anti-stupid" attitude.

No, it is anti-open carry attitudes on an open carry forum.

No. It's not.

Yes, it is.

This is no lees about stupid than the stupid baiting of cops that some idiot did in a park in Tennessee.

Nothing more than being an attention whore. The Airsoft gun didn't garner the attention he desired, so he tried a shotgun. Just like the stupid attention whore in TN that didn't get the attention he desired with a S&W pistol, so he tried an ak-47 and subsequently got the attention he desired. But it all backfired when he lost his lawsuit.
Logged
Want to keep informed of events in your area? Go to http://www.miopencarry.org/update

Offline kwikrnu

  • AmmoDump
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #123 on: June 25, 2012, 04:44:03 PM »
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 04:33:04 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:25:26 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 04:19:39 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 03:52:00 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 01:42:11 PM
Wow, so much anti-open carry attitude on an open carry website... :'(

More like "anti-stupid" attitude.

No, it is anti-open carry attitudes on an open carry forum.

No. It's not.

Yes, it is.

This is no lees about stupid than the stupid baiting of cops that some idiot did in a park in Tennessee.

Nothing more than being an attention whore. The Airsoft gun didn't garner the attention he desired, so he tried a shotgun. Just like the stupid attention whore in TN that didn't get the attention he desired with a S&W pistol, so he tried an ak-47 and subsequently got the attention he desired. But it all backfired when he lost his lawsuit.

I thought the carry of shotguns was off-topic? 

I simply open carried a handgun where it was lawful to carry and the lawsuit is alive and well and will be argued in the 6th circuit coa next month.
Logged

Offline CV67PAT

  • MOC Charter Member
  • Posts: 2615
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #124 on: June 25, 2012, 04:50:35 PM »
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:44:03 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 04:33:04 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:25:26 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 04:19:39 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 03:52:00 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 01:42:11 PM
Wow, so much anti-open carry attitude on an open carry website... :'(

More like "anti-stupid" attitude.

No, it is anti-open carry attitudes on an open carry forum.

No. It's not.

Yes, it is.

This is no lees about stupid than the stupid baiting of cops that some idiot did in a park in Tennessee.

Nothing more than being an attention whore. The Airsoft gun didn't garner the attention he desired, so he tried a shotgun. Just like the stupid attention whore in TN that didn't get the attention he desired with a S&W pistol, so he tried an ak-47 and subsequently got the attention he desired. But it all backfired when he lost his lawsuit.

I thought the carry of shotguns was off-topic? 

I simply open carried a handgun where it was lawful to carry and the lawsuit is alive and well and will be argued in the 6th circuit coa next month.

That was YOU?!?!?

ROFLMFAO!!!
Logged
Want to keep informed of events in your area? Go to http://www.miopencarry.org/update

Offline TheQ

  • Website Content Manager
  • MOC Lifetime Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4263
    • Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
  • First Name (Displayed): Phillip
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #125 on: June 25, 2012, 05:06:45 PM »
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:44:03 PM

I thought the carry of shotguns was off-topic? 


It is.  The CADL suit was started not because of soemone carying a shotgun, but rather because CADL began ejecting people who were openly carrying holstered handguns.  This prompted the suit, not the shotgun incident.
Logged
I Am Not A Lawyer (nor a gunsmith).

Offline CV67PAT

  • MOC Charter Member
  • Posts: 2615
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #126 on: June 25, 2012, 05:34:10 PM »
Quote from: TheQ on June 25, 2012, 05:06:45 PM
Quote from: kwikrnu on June 25, 2012, 04:44:03 PM

I thought the carry of shotguns was off-topic? 


It is.  The CADL suit was started not because of soemone carying a shotgun, but rather because CADL began ejecting people who were openly carrying holstered handguns.  This prompted the suit, not the shotgun incident.

Regardless, the suit was brought against MOC. Therefore it is a subject for discussion, even if it involved an AT-4.
Logged
Want to keep informed of events in your area? Go to http://www.miopencarry.org/update

Offline yance

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 442
  • First Name (Displayed): Adam
Re: Temporary Restraining Order-CADL v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
« Reply #127 on: June 25, 2012, 06:42:16 PM »
Quote from: CV67PAT on June 25, 2012, 05:34:10 PM

Regardless, the suit was brought against MOC. Therefore it is a subject for discussion, even if it involved an AT-4.

You never know when you'll need one!

Martial Law Training, St. Louis? Army Trains MP's To Drive Tanks On U.S. Streets - UPDATE 6/23/12
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]
« previous next »