New post in FAQ thread

[TheQ]

I made a post here, I'm open to suggestions/comments.

Many thanks!

[gryphon]

I would change the word "anyhow" to "anyway" in your first reason. Otherwise it looks pretty good and makes it clear. I like your example of a security camera.

[CV67PAT]

I disagree completely that signs have ANY legal standing whatsoever.

Can you cite a single situation where they were ever used in any prosecution?

I didn't think so.

More bad legal advice.

[TheQ]

I disagree completely that signs have ANY legal standing whatsoever.

Can you cite a single situation where they were ever used in any prosecution?

I didn't think so.

More bad legal advice.

I cited the law right in the thread. This interpretation is backed up by Stu Weiss, Dean Greenblatt, Jim Makowski, Steve Dulan, and Steve Sudeen. Note, it puts a big burden on the prosecution that they have to prove that you knew you're not welcome beyond all reasonable doubt. One could say that they didn't see the sign.

[CV67PAT]

I guess you didn't read this part:

A request to leave the premises is not a necessary element for a violation of this subdivision.

[/i][/b]

[TheQ]

I guess you didn't read this part:

That's subsection c. I boldest subsection a and b.

[TheQ]

That's subsection c. I bolded subsection a and b.