Author Topic: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock  (Read 1621 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline gryphon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
  • First Name (Displayed): Dan
Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« on: February 26, 2014, 08:01:09 PM »

Offline TheQ

  • Website Content Manager
  • MOC Lifetime Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4263
    • Michigan Open Carry, Inc.
  • First Name (Displayed): Phillip
Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2014, 08:58:57 PM »
Why did he have to rack the slide? SMH
I Am Not A Lawyer (nor a gunsmith).

Offline Jeff

  • Posts: 1166
Re: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2014, 04:05:50 PM »
Poor little guy.  But at least he has one in the chamber now.

Offline jgillmanjr

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 654
    • Freedom Forged Security Consulting
  • First Name (Displayed): Jason
Re: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2014, 04:28:14 PM »
Waste. I would have at least tried taking the meat.

Also, doesn't look like the guy made sure the Moose was actually done. THAT is probably what pisses me off.
IT Director
Deputy Treasurer
Legislative Aide

Offline Jeff

  • Posts: 1166
Re: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2014, 04:32:20 PM »
Waste. I would have at least tried taking the meat.

Also, doesn't look like the guy made sure the Moose was actually done. THAT is probably what pisses me off.

I wish he would have given it a head shot so that it didn't suffer, but I didn't want to be one of those guys.

Offline jgillmanjr

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 654
    • Freedom Forged Security Consulting
  • First Name (Displayed): Jason
Re: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2014, 04:39:02 PM »
I wish he would have given it a head shot so that it didn't suffer, but I didn't want to be one of those guys.

I don't see anything wrong with not wanting an animal to suffer.

I understand the self defense shoot (although I would have had my firearm out at the first suspicion the animal may attack), but at least make sure it's not suffering.
IT Director
Deputy Treasurer
Legislative Aide

Offline karudin

  • Posts: 69
  • First Name (Displayed): Gregg
Re: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2014, 04:57:37 PM »
Waste. I would have at least tried taking the meat.

Also, doesn't look like the guy made sure the Moose was actually done. THAT is probably what pisses me off.

I was thinking the same thing. Don't just leave without making sure the animal is dead. I've seen animals with arrows still stuck in them. My grandfather took a deer one year that had a hole in its neck. I'm sure his adrenaline was pumping but still.

Offline METL

  • Posts: 632
Re: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2014, 11:53:24 AM »
Yeah, cause you really wanna be around when that thing decides not to be dead anymore and goes back on a rampage...






I do think he headshot it from the get go though...

Offline Jeff

  • Posts: 1166
Re: Møøse v. squirrel, er, Glock
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2014, 06:32:52 PM »
DAUM, I would need extra scent blocker pants after that.