What do we have to do to get people to understand the four SCOTUS decisions that say exactly the oposite of what she thinks?
Law-enforcement has no duty to protect individuals. South v. Maryland
There is no duty owed by the police, the city, or the state to act to prevent or avoid harm to citizens. Susman v. City of Los Angeles
The state has no affirmative duty to protect an individual, even if they know that person is in danger. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services
Neither the police nor the government is liable to victims for failure to provide adequate police protection. Warren v. District of Columbia
Police departments enjoy absolute immunity for failure to provide sufficient police protection. Hartzler v. City of San Jose
Neither cities nor police departments are responsible for failing to enforce restraining orders or protect citizens. Castle Rock v. Gonzales
“Failure to provide adequate police protection will not result in governmental liability, nor will a public entity be liable for failure to arrest a person who is violating the law.” Antique Arts Corp. v. City of Torrence
“There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered.” Bowers v. DeVito