Open Carry Specific > OC Experiences
got sheriff called me in iosco county this weekend
CV67PAT:
--- Quote from: Pond Scum on October 31, 2014, 03:05:34 PM ---Bad for the people that overdose and die, bad for the people that are killed or injured in car accidents caused by people on drugs, bad for the people that are robbed by people that want money for drugs, bad for the school children that take drugs and have the chemicals changed in their developing brain, bad for the "otherwise honest entrepreneur" that gets gunned down by a not so honest competitor, bad for me and the value of my house because of all of the "drug houses" in my neighborhood, bad for the thousands of Mexicans that are kidnapped or murdered every year by the drug cartels......... This is just a quick list from the "top of my head". I would contend that drugs are bad for a whole lot of people.
--- End quote ---
Let's add the family members of the drug abusers to this list.
--- Quote from: Pond Scum on October 31, 2014, 04:01:07 PM ---part deux, you don't need to fix it for me. I'm happy with how I worded it.
--- End quote ---
He's right you know. The most widely abused drug is the legal one... alcohol.
CV67PAT:
--- Quote from: part deux on November 05, 2014, 06:50:49 PM ---as long as we're off topic... good friend of mine is a "provider" She's absolutely convinced cannabis is a great aid to cancer.
--- End quote ---
We're off topic? When did that occur?
Hiram Walker is absolute (get it "absolute"?) convinced that alcohol has great medicinal purposes too.
m.marino:
Unfortunately no the most widely abused drugs are OTC Pain killers. They are also one of the largest causes of death and morbidity. Next comes nicotine, than caffeine (which has it's own issues). Alcohol has the rap due to the number of groups that still want to remove it from society and blame the item instead of the social and personal habits and issues of the persons involved. As far as Cannabis is concerned the data on risks or benefits is thin on the ground in both camps and should be a persons choice. I personally can't stand the stuff as it makes me sick to smell it burning at all. Not that this has anything to do with the OP and we really need to stop these wide tangents.
Langenc:
--- Quote from: bigt8261 on June 24, 2014, 02:36:18 PM ---No, that's not it. If it's a boat with a motor, then I would agree a CPL is required. IIRC, there is another statute outside of 750.227 that covers this. Yep, 750.227c. Note, 750.231 applies to 227c just as it applies to 227.
What I was asking about was the justification for the stop. We know an officer can't pull a vehicle over just to make sure the drive is licensed. We also know an officer can't stop someone on the street just to make sure their firearm is licensed.
Can an officer stop a vehicle to make sure the operator has a CPL?
Or, did the stop come about under the pretense of fishing regs?
--- End quote ---
Kinda old post but was it CC or OC?? Interesting. Im watching this one.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version