Author Topic: Suitable teeth for pre-emption?  (Read 4803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CitizensHaveRights

  • Posts: 1056
  • First Name (Displayed): Mitch
Suitable teeth for pre-emption?
« on: May 26, 2015, 03:21:54 PM »
I suspect that if this were the law in MI, there never would have been a CADL suit:

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/05/dean-weingarten/tx-bill-reducing-of-gun-free-zones-awaits-gov-abbotts-signature/

The Texas legislation has teeth, but fair notice must be given to the government entities that break the law. Once a government entity is placed on notice that they are in violation of the law, they will have 15 days to remove the offending sign.

First offenses will incur fines of $1,000 to $1,500 per day. Second offenses are fined $10,000 to $10,500 per day.
"A well balanced breakfast being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed "  - Who has a right to keep and eat food, The People or A Well Balanced Breakfast?

Offline Langenc

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
Re: Suitable teeth for pre-emption?
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2015, 05:32:40 PM »
Here comes the dumb question guy--

  who gets the thousands of $$$??

Offline CitizensHaveRights

  • Posts: 1056
  • First Name (Displayed): Mitch
Re: Suitable teeth for pre-emption?
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2015, 10:22:24 PM »
That was a good question.
I assumed the state, but not quite, it goes to the crime victims' compensation fund.

(e)  A civil penalty collected by the attorney general under
     this section shall be deposited to the credit of the compensation to
     victims of crime fund established under Subchapter B, Chapter 56,
     Code of Criminal Procedure.
"A well balanced breakfast being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed "  - Who has a right to keep and eat food, The People or A Well Balanced Breakfast?