Michigan Open Carry, Inc.

General Category => Latest News Stories => Topic started by: Michigun on November 13, 2015, 11:42:13 AM

Title: 147 comments Snyder vows to veto bill allowing concealed guns in Michigan school
Post by: Michigun on November 13, 2015, 11:42:13 AM
MLive article - Snyder vows to veto bill allowing concealed guns in Michigan schools: 'It should be a local option'

http://www.mlive.com/lansing-news/index.ssf/2015/11/snyder_vows_to_veto_bill_allow.html#incart_river_home (http://www.mlive.com/lansing-news/index.ssf/2015/11/snyder_vows_to_veto_bill_allow.html#incart_river_home)
Title: Re: 147 comments Snyder vows to veto bill allowing concealed guns in Michigan school
Post by: CitizensHaveRights on November 13, 2015, 01:00:07 PM
Because Engler might have signed pre-emption into law, but anti gun shits like Granholm and Snyder would never dream of doing anything like that.
Title: Re: 147 comments Snyder vows to veto bill allowing concealed guns in Michigan school
Post by: bigt8261 on November 13, 2015, 02:33:59 PM
Engler didn't sign preemption, it was his predecessor Blanchard (D).
Title: Re: 147 comments Snyder vows to veto bill allowing concealed guns in Michigan school
Post by: CitizensHaveRights on November 13, 2015, 02:54:38 PM
Preemption was signed in 1990 before Jamie's failed re-election bid?
Why was I thinking 1993?
Title: Re: 147 comments Snyder vows to veto bill allowing concealed guns in Michigan school
Post by: TheQ on November 14, 2015, 04:37:40 PM

Quote from: CitizensHaveRights on November 13, 2015, 01:00:07 PM
Because Engler might have signed pre-emption into law, but anti gun shits like Granholm and Snyder would never dream of doing anything like that.

Granholm sigh self defense act of 2006...
Title: Re: 147 comments Snyder vows to veto bill allowing concealed guns in Michigan school
Post by: CitizensHaveRights on November 18, 2015, 04:42:44 PM
Snyder says it should be a local option, but:

http://wmuk.org/post/school-leaders-say-they-dont-want-option-outlaw-guns

But the Michigan Association of School Administrators (MASA) say local school boards aren’t equipped to handle those decisions.

My comment: If MASA says they aren't equipped to make decisions like that, how can they pretend to recommend to the legislature the supposed need for a statewide ban? What say you, Mr Wigent?