Are you saying that a privately owned hospital can allow concealed carry without a CPL?
Mosty I ignore you but you do make a valid point that I what I wrote wasn't clear so I'll clarify.
No, a private hospital may not make a rule that supersedes state law. They cannot make a rule that allows unlicensed concealed carry because NO private property owner may allow that. A privately owned hospital has all the rights of any other privately owned property so they may allow or disallow
legal firearm possession as they wish.
Or say OC without a CPL?
Actually, yes they may allow OC without a CPL as 750.234d allows for open firearms possession in any of the listed firearm free zones if the carrier has permission from the owner/management.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person shall not possess a firearm on the premises of any of the following:
(g) A hospital.
(2) This section does not apply to any of the following:
(d) A person who possesses a firearm on the premises of an entity described in subsection (1) if that possession is with the permission of the owner or an agent of the owner of that entity.
Bronson