« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Federal Judge Upholds Connecticut's Assault Weapons Ban  (Read 4974 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gryphon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4038
  • First Name (Displayed): Dan
Federal Judge Upholds Connecticut's Assault Weapons Ban
« on: January 31, 2014, 07:03:22 AM »
Logged

Offline FASBOLD

  • Posts: 194
  • First Name (Displayed): Larry
Re: Federal Judge Upholds Connecticut's Assault Weapons Ban
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2014, 09:51:30 AM »
I think this quote from the ruling in the article invalidates the judge's own ruling.

Quote
"While the act burdens the plaintiffs' Second Amendment rights, it is substantially related to the important governmental interest of public safety and crime control."

How is a burden not an infringement?
Logged
"The people of these United States are the rightful masters of both Congresses and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."
~ Abraham Lincoln
                     ****
"Too young to die, too old to take an ass whippin'."
~ Unknown

Offline jgillmanjr

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 654
    • Freedom Forged Security Consulting
  • First Name (Displayed): Jason
Re: Federal Judge Upholds Connecticut's Assault Weapons Ban
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2014, 10:02:57 AM »
Quote from: FASBOLD on January 31, 2014, 09:51:30 AM
I think this quote from the ruling in the article invalidates the judge's own ruling.

How is a burden not an infringement?

It's the same [lack of] logic used to justify Breyer's 'interest balancing inquiry' that he touted in his Heller dissent.
Logged
IT Director
Deputy Treasurer
Legislative Aide

Offline autosurgeon

  • MOC Treasurer
  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1056
  • First Name (Displayed): Ryan
Re: Federal Judge Upholds Connecticut's Assault Weapons Ban
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2014, 03:57:09 PM »
This us similar logic to when Clinton debated the definition of "is"

Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk

Logged
Anything I post may be my opinion and not the law... you are responsible to do your own verification.

Blackstone (1753-1765) maintains that "the law holds that it is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Pages: [1]
« previous next »