Author Topic: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex  (Read 27036 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mouse1223

  • Posts: 3
  • First Name (Displayed): JC
Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« on: June 26, 2018, 11:49:37 AM »
Not sure if this is the right place for this so please move it if needed.

On Saturday June 16th I attended an event at the Taylor Sportsplex. Doors opened for the event at 5pm and i showed up about 5:15/5:20 for a 6pm event start. At about 5:30 an employee and one of the staff for the event approached me asking if I could open carry at the Sportsplex. I responded to their question that yes, i could open carry that there were no signs. During this brief conversation the Sportsplex staff member mentioned that the Sportsplex was owned by the city. Both the staff member for the Sportsplex and the event staff member left it at that and returned to where they came. Then about 10 minutes later i got this weird feeling and looked over my shoulder at the door to see several officers standing outside in the atrium. A few moments later 4 officers approached me and the lead officer (Johnson) asked if we could speak in the atrium. I basically asked why, and Johnson asked again if we could speak in the atrium so that we wouldn't make a scene and so we could hear each other better. He asked me if i had a CPL which i produced along with my drivers license and we walked out to the atrium where we were met by 4+ more officers. I situate myself so that all of the officers are in front of me and the event is to my back and officer Johnson accuses me of refusing to leave. I explain to him that i was never asked to leave and that by either person that approached me earlier and his tone immediately changes. I explain that i answered their questions and they left. I explain that there are no signs on the any of the doors. Johnson asks me why i didn’t just conceal carry and i explain to him that i wanted to be legal at the Sportsplex since the Sportsplex hosts several men's hockey leagues there and i figure the Sportsplex sold beer/alcohol. It is explained to me that the Sportsplex doesn’t have a liquor license that the event got a special license for the event. Its around here where the building being owned by the city is brought up by the officer Johnson. I ask him if the city owns the building. He tries to deflect the question and i ask him several times before he tells me that the city owns the property but a private company owns the building. Johnson says that even though he’s an officer he couldn’t take his firearm to a lions game its a private company. I say to him that if the city owns the building he possibly could. I also say to him that as long as there are no signs you can open carry in most places as long as you have a CPL including gas stations which sell alcohol. Johnson says to me after another officer steps back into the conversation from running my info that i’m being asked to leave. I inform him again that i was never asked to leave or even to put my firearm in my vehicle. Johnson asks me if i’m will to do that. I tell him that since i would like to stay for the event that i would be willing to put my firearm in my vehicle.

Side notes:
This is my recollection of the events so i may be forgetting some things and forgot to record this, nor did i happen to see any body cam’s on any of the officers.
Building capacity was never brought up by the officers and i forgot, so his question as to why i didn’t just conceal carry is him suggesting i break the law as i’m pretty sure the Sportsplex houses more than 2500 people.
I figured out later that he was lying to me and that both the Sportsplex facebook page and the Wikipedia both have the City of Taylor listed as the owner. Further investigation via a conversation with Jeff Bobek confirmed that the City of Taylor does indeed own the Sportsplex.
I did make a comment after we got to the atrium along the lines of "what slow day" after i saw all the officers.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 03:51:29 PM by Mouse1223 »

Offline smellslikemichigan

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 130
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2018, 12:22:39 PM »
Signs don't carry the weight of law in Michigan. This is especially true of public places where they would be unenforceable anyway. Sounds like the officer called your bluff. It can be intimidating to be surrounded and harrassed like that the first time. Ultimately no one got shot and you were able to finish your event. It's just a shame the some officers are more likely to protect feelings than rights.
It took me years to get to this point, but sometimes all it takes is politely asserting your rights and letting them know you aren't going to cave. I had been open carrying for years when this incident occurred, but I was still somewhat nervous. I'm generally ready to be arrested in situations like this... but I would prefer not to be.

There's supposed to be a youtube video link here, but I'm not seeing it.


Even if you didn't see body cams you can still submit a FOIA and request any/all media regarding the incident. There might be some audio or recorded phone calls. Also, you can see if any reports were filed and what was alleged.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2018, 07:55:08 PM by gryphon »
"I like users who quote themselves in their signature lines." -smellslikemichigan

Offline Mouse1223

  • Posts: 3
  • First Name (Displayed): JC
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2018, 04:01:12 PM »
Well, I did submit the FOIA form to get the building record and they wanted $40 for something that if i really wanted to do the digging i could probably find within public record. Mr. Dobek said they have outstanding bonds on the building which means that buried somewhere in those public bonds is the information Dobek gave me. And i would say that the officer did to a certain extent call my bluff. I didn't really think to look up who exactly owned the building. But i will know this information for next time. I also know now that there are no capacity signs on the building, which if im not mistaken there should be. It also showed me, this being my first encounter that i do need to slow down some more and let my brain think. I have a tendency to think fast talk fast.

Offline gryphon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4038
  • First Name (Displayed): Dan
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2018, 07:56:26 PM »
Dan, I fixed your youtube link.

Offline gryphon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4038
  • First Name (Displayed): Dan
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2018, 07:59:28 PM »
JC, I've asked Tom Lambert to take a look at this thread, but if you are on facebook you should post this to the MOC group page there.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/MichiganOpenCarry/

Ask to "join" if you are not already a member.

Offline bigt8261

  • MOC President
  • MOC Board Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1482
    • Michigan Open Carry, Inc
  • First Name (Displayed): Tom
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2018, 09:36:32 AM »
Thanks Dan for the notice. I can't tell you when the last time I posted here was.

According to Wikipedia, the Taylor Sportsplex is "owned by and located in the City of Taylor"

The page for the sportsplex on the website for the sportsplex (yes, I said that right), has the following breadcumb "Home > Government > Departments > Recreation > Taylor Sportsplex"

Thus, I think it's reasonable to conclude that the facility is a publicly owned facility, and therefore preemption applies.

As someone else stated, signs do not hold weight of law in Michigan. They CAN constitute reasonable notice for trespassing, but they need to be pretty obvious to achieve a successful prosecution without further warning. Usually, the police will provide a warning of their own before any enforcement, which is what happened to you. At the same time, this also means that you can be asked to leave without a sign being posted at all.

I think you have confused having a liquor license (MCL 750.234d(1)(h)) with, a bar or tavern with the primary source of alcohol (MCL 28.425o(1)(d)). The first one prohibits all firearm possession, but also exempts anyone with a license to carry a concealed pistol, or with permission. The second one, only prohibits the possession of a concealed pistol. Building capacity (MCL 28.425o(1)(f)) is for an entertainment facility with a 2500+ capacity, where the person knows or should know of the capacity, and it also only prohibits concealed pistols. I would say it's questionable whether or not the facility meets this capacity, and if it's questionable, then the prohibition doesn't apply.

Johnson was wrong about taking is firearm to a Lions game. Ford Field permits officers to carry concealed under LEOSA.

Bottom Line:
Unless a private entity leased the entire facility, they could not have asked you to leave or put your firearm in your vehicle. That goes for all parties involved.

Let me know if I can help. I would love to see your FOIA request (what you sent) and anything that comes back from it. I an very well versed in FOIA and can help you here too. If necessary, we can contact the Taylor PD to make sure they back off next time.

tlambert@miopencarry.org

Offline smellslikemichigan

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 130
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2018, 03:54:32 PM »
Dan, I fixed your youtube link.

Thanks, Dan
"I like users who quote themselves in their signature lines." -smellslikemichigan

Offline Mouse1223

  • Posts: 3
  • First Name (Displayed): JC
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2018, 02:16:45 PM »
Thus, I think it's reasonable to conclude that the facility is a publicly owned facility, and therefore preemption applies.

As someone else stated, signs do not hold weight of law in Michigan. They CAN constitute reasonable notice for trespassing, but they need to be pretty obvious to achieve a successful prosecution without further warning. Usually, the police will provide a warning of their own before any enforcement, which is what happened to you. At the same time, this also means that you can be asked to leave without a sign being posted at all.
For simplicity i look for the sign to indicate whether i can or can not carry my firearm into the building. Now whether i can or can't even if the sign is there is a different story because that all comes down to what can be proven.

I think you have confused having a liquor license (MCL 750.234d(1)(h)) with, a bar or tavern with the primary source of alcohol (MCL 28.425o(1)(d)). The first one prohibits all firearm possession, but also exempts anyone with a license to carry a concealed pistol, or with permission. The second one, only prohibits the possession of a concealed pistol. Building capacity (MCL 28.425o(1)(f)) is for an entertainment facility with a 2500+ capacity, where the person knows or should know of the capacity, and it also only prohibits concealed pistols. I would say it's questionable whether or not the facility meets this capacity, and if it's questionable, then the prohibition doesn't apply.
Correct me if i'm wrong but both Liquor and capacity indicate whether i can conceal carry or not for the sake of i'm always going to have my firearm on me. It just means to me whether or not i can have my shirt over it. With a place like Taylor Sportsplex (where i thought they had a liquor license) I felt it was safer to just open carry so i didn't have to worry about the percentages and sales.

Johnson was wrong about taking is firearm to a Lions game. Ford Field permits officers to carry concealed under LEOSA.

Bottom Line:
Unless a private entity leased the entire facility, they could not have asked you to leave or put your firearm in your vehicle. That goes for all parties involved.
So IF Ford Field and LCA are owned by the city of Detroit, but the respected Sports teams lease the whole building it null and voids the preemption clause in our state constitution?

I took some pictures of the building to show that they dont have a max capacity sign at any of the doors. As for the FIOA request i have not followed up on that yet. Jeff Dobek did confirm to me in a phone conversation that the city does own the building. That was good enough for me at the time so i didn't feel the need to get the actual building document stating such.

Side note: Taylor may need to be contacted about their response to open carry in public buildings.

Offline Glock9mmOldStyle

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 603
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2018, 08:50:24 PM »
Not sure if this is the right place for this so please move it if needed.

On Saturday June 16th I attended an event at the Taylor Sportsplex. Doors opened for the event at 5pm and i showed up about 5:15/5:20 for a 6pm event start. At about 5:30 an employee and one of the staff for the event approached me asking if I could open carry at the Sportsplex. I responded to their question that yes, i could open carry that there were no signs. During this brief conversation the Sportsplex staff member mentioned that the Sportsplex was owned by the city. Both the staff member for the Sportsplex and the event staff member left it at that and returned to where they came. Then about 10 minutes later i got this weird feeling and looked over my shoulder at the door to see several officers standing outside in the atrium. A few moments later 4 officers approached me and the lead officer (Johnson) asked if we could speak in the atrium. I basically asked why, and Johnson asked again if we could speak in the atrium so that we wouldn't make a scene and so we could hear each other better. He asked me if i had a CPL which i produced along with my drivers license and we walked out to the atrium where we were met by 4+ more officers. I situate myself so that all of the officers are in front of me and the event is to my back and officer Johnson accuses me of refusing to leave. I explain to him that i was never asked to leave and that by either person that approached me earlier and his tone immediately changes. I explain that i answered their questions and they left. I explain that there are no signs on the any of the doors. Johnson asks me why i didn’t just conceal carry and i explain to him that i wanted to be legal at the Sportsplex since the Sportsplex hosts several men's hockey leagues there and i figure the Sportsplex sold beer/alcohol. It is explained to me that the Sportsplex doesn’t have a liquor license that the event got a special license for the event. Its around here where the building being owned by the city is brought up by the officer Johnson. I ask him if the city owns the building. He tries to deflect the question and i ask him several times before he tells me that the city owns the property but a private company owns the building. Johnson says that even though he’s an officer he couldn’t take his firearm to a lions game its a private company. I say to him that if the city owns the building he possibly could. I also say to him that as long as there are no signs you can open carry in most places as long as you have a CPL including gas stations which sell alcohol. Johnson says to me after another officer steps back into the conversation from running my info that i’m being asked to leave. I inform him again that i was never asked to leave or even to put my firearm in my vehicle. Johnson asks me if i’m will to do that. I tell him that since i would like to stay for the event that i would be willing to put my firearm in my vehicle.

Side notes:
This is my recollection of the events so i may be forgetting some things and forgot to record this, nor did i happen to see any body cam’s on any of the officers.
Building capacity was never brought up by the officers and i forgot, so his question as to why i didn’t just conceal carry is him suggesting i break the law as i’m pretty sure the Sportsplex houses more than 2500 people.
I figured out later that he was lying to me and that both the Sportsplex facebook page and the Wikipedia both have the City of Taylor listed as the owner. Further investigation via a conversation with Jeff Bobek confirmed that the City of Taylor does indeed own the Sportsplex.
I did make a comment after we got to the atrium along the lines of "what slow day" after i saw all the officers.

Sadly Taylor-Tuckey has been playing games with OCers for years. It is IMHO if not the most corrupt PD in the Downriver area, certainly in the top 3!

Now that's saying something. They -Taylor PD & officials know the law regarding OC, they just pick & choose when to obey it.

OP - be extremely careful OCing in the city of Taylor and for God's sake use a: DVR, a covert camera, a streaming camera, when/if you do OC there again.

They (TPD) are masters at playing the "stupid game" and sadly *most* in the city government support and encourage their ridiculous behavior.

They had a very large MOC turn out that made all the news and papers back in 2011 (iirc), looks like they need another visit? Sad little people, once again running their crooked little town into the ground. :(
« Last Edit: July 23, 2018, 02:18:18 AM by Glock9mmOldStyle »
"It is now more likely that a person will be the victim of a violent crime than that he will be in an auto accident. Despite this, most people readily believe that the existence of the police relieves them of the responsibility to take full measures to protect themselves."
 -Jeffrey Snyder 1993

Offline gryphon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4038
  • First Name (Displayed): Dan
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2018, 04:08:37 PM »
Hey Glock9mm, just an FYI, your sig quote is falsely attributed to Madison in the Federalist Papers. The quote is actually from Jeffrey R. Snyder in his essay 'A NATION OF COWARDS', published in the Fall '93 issue of The Public Interest, a quarterly journal of opinion published by National Affairs, Inc.

Here is a reprint of the piece: http://www.rkba.org/comment/cowards.html

Offline Glock9mmOldStyle

  • MOC Member
  • *
  • Posts: 603
Re: Open Carry at the Taylor Sportsplex
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2018, 02:03:30 AM »
Thanks Gryphon for the link to an excellent read and it has inspired a new quote line in my signature
 ;D
"It is now more likely that a person will be the victim of a violent crime than that he will be in an auto accident. Despite this, most people readily believe that the existence of the police relieves them of the responsibility to take full measures to protect themselves."
 -Jeffrey Snyder 1993