There's a difference between a 'valid point' and an opinion. Valid points have data to back them up. Opinions are just more hot air.
If he wanted to be an 'effective' spokesperson, he needs to advocate the entire Second Amendment, not just those parts he feels are 'OK'. That's how we go ourselves in this mess to begin with- self appointed 'spokesmen' throwing one part of the movement under the bus for their own aggrandizement. It's shameful & pathetic.
OCers support your right to conceal; why do some CCers feel that they must convert OCers to their way of thinking?
In the end, you're both wrong; 'its the mission profile, stupid'.